According to the stats, the most used operating systems are Android developed by Google and iOS developed by Apple. So the fact is, a majority of the Apps nowadays are created for these two operating systems.
When it comes to app development, deciding whether to go for native or hybrid app can be a confusing and time-consuming decision. Your selection will be influenced by you/your client, app requirements and the amount of cash and time you can invest. In this article, we will highlight some of the pros and cons of native vs. hybrid apps and give you some factors on which to decide between the two.
What are Native and Hybrid Apps?
Native apps are developed specifically for a particular OS. Native apps have to be built using the native language of the OS, like Objective-C for iOS, and Java for Android. Hybrid apps are fundamentally web apps covered behind a native app wrapper. They are developed for various platforms and can be straightaway disseminated among app stores with no need to create two different source code versions for Android and iOS. We are listing below some of the pros and cons of native vs. hybrid apps.
Native Apps Pros
Being built for a specific platform, native apps work faster and are more sophisticated than their hybrid counterparts. They are generally used in high-performance apps. A hybrid app commonly is not as fast as a native app.
A hybrid app won’t be able to give users a completely native experience. Native apps utilize system interface components that are recognized by users and furthermore permit developers to generate meaningful, graphic transitions and alterations which assist in continuing the work flow.
Convenient access to integrated capabilities
Native apps don’t have any issue tapping into each and every functionality of the gadget, for example: camera, microphone, calendar, GPS etc. whereas hybrid apps rely on third party plug-ins to access them.
Native apps are more conveniently found by users in the App Store (understandably apps with enhanced UX get highlighted more often), so reaching your prospective clients may be easier.
Native app cons
The price of sustaining various code bases will be quite larger than that for a single code base.
Developing a native app involves more time and work than creating a functional hybrid app. Generally more time will be consumed and more developers will be wanted, possessing the expertise and knowledge necessary to create apps for different operating systems.
Hybrid App Pros
The reduced budget of creating a hybrid app as an alternative for a native application is one of the major benefits of this solution. Two separate versions aren’t required for Android and iOS, in its place you develop an app equipped for both platforms (supposing you don’t bother about receiving a native-like interface).
Less time is required to develop hybrid apps since the app doesn’t have to be developed separately for different operating systems.
Hybrid App Cons
Absence of certain native features
Some Android and iOS apps have features which are only accessible on their native apps. So a hybrid app can be at a disadvantage by the absence of native-only features.
Hybrid apps are typically a lot more sluggish and less advanced than the native colleagues, so it makes using high-performance apps and games an exasperating experience.
Provided the design is decent, it nonetheless won’t give the native sensation, since you are attempting to link one version to both platforms.
App Store approval
If you are a novice to App development, it should not come as a surprise if app submission may not be straightforward and an apparently little mistake can cause app rejection and lots of wasted time in case of any careless mistake and violation of the App Store rules.
You should go for native app development if you need the following:
- Fast Response Time
- High End Graphics
- High use of the phone’s hardware resources such as phone sensors.
However, if you want a simple app with basic functionalities, with cheaper origination costs and faster speed to market, you should go for hybrid app development.